STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY & CHEMICAL EVIDENCEDataset v1.2 · Phase 6D · Comparative experimental recognition environments

Primary-source preparation · Phase 6B

SYC6

parent graph verified assayed material unresolved. The tested preparation is distinct from any structural chemical component.

Primary source 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6c00983

Source-reported parent graph

InChIKey: FATGNMUUDUSRIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N. This derived identifier describes the source-reported molecular graph; the measured material's salt, lot and composition were not independently established.

Published SMILES: FC1=CC(NC2=C(N=C3C=CC(CN)=CN32)C4=CC=C(Br)C=C4)=CN=C1

1 experimental observations

Every row retains its original source conditions

Target scopeEndpointConstruct, method, conditionsPrimary source location
NSD3 PWWP instance unresolved
No exact isolated PWWP-domain instance assigned
Kd =0.25 ± 0.06 µM
published ± statistic not independently confirmed
SPR (publisher compound table header)
Construct not verified
Original article table lacks complete assay condition and tested construct details
Replicate details not verified
Publisher source compound table row 32; SPR Kd (µM) column
Binding method supported by publisher table header; experimental sequence/variant, statistic and salt/lot remain uncertain. No experimentally deposited PWWP-bound complex verified.

Experimental structural relationship

No verified PWWP-bound experimental structure of this preparation was identified in this Phase 6B snapshot. Docked poses and AlphaFold/predicted conformers do not replace deposited experimental coordinates.

Source-provenance and uncertainty

AI-Driven Discovery of a Hydrophobic-Tag Degrader Targeting NSD3 for Lung Squamous Carcinoma Therapy (DOI 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6c00983)

Access level: publisher hosted primary compound table and abstract

Unresolved: Original source table supplies compound name, SMILES, SPR Kd and reported uncertainty/censored sign. Protein construct boundaries, replicate definitions and assay preparation lots/salts remain unverified. Linked docking models are predictions rather than experimentally deposited complexes.